Posts Tagged ‘Disease’


Here I was feeling low, slow, down and depressed.  Then I read this article, and it cheered me right up!

Turns out we People With Parkinson’s are making OTHER folks WEALTHY!

And who wouldn’t feel good about THAT?

The Parkinson’s disease market is approaching maturity, with the threat of generic incursion evident in each drug class. Although growth will be stifled by generic launches, relatively successful lifecycle management strategies and new product launches see the Parkinson’s disease market grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 2.6% over the next 10 years.

So invest now in Parkinson’s drugs!  Then keep your fingers crossed that those damn GENERIC drugs don’t cut into your profits by making the disease a little less EXPENSIVE for the people who SUFFER from it.   And just hope that those GENES they’re fiddling around with don’t actually result in a CURE!  That would REALLY hurt your investment!  And you better get in now, because the market is approaching maturity!

Truthfully?  It sickens me just a little bit to know that there are folks out there speculating on how much worse the current Parkinson’s epidemic is going to be.  It rankles me just a tad to know that there are people betting money that MORE people will come down with this damned disease and that the more people who GET Parkinson’s the richer these investors get!

I know that these drugs don’t make themselves.  And I believe in capitalism.  And I believe in the right to invest in a product if you believe its value is going to increase.  But there’s just something kind of shocking to see this disease being discussed in such cold, monetary terms.  It just seems so… mercenary.  Like finding a cure will end up in people losing money or something.

And that would be TERRIBLE!

Now, TAKE THE POLL!

This "Diary" of yours is NICE and all, but it would be BETTER if... (You MAY choose more than one!)

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
More
Last Updated on Wednesday, 3 March 2010 06:45

Parkinson’s Help from Across the Pond

Got a very friendly e-mail overnight from Dr. David Churchman, a project manager for Health Outcomes — part of Isis Innovation Limited.  They’re the technology transfer company for the University of Oxford (that’s all the way over there in Great Britain!), and he works closely with some of the folks who developed the Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire I referenced yesterday.

He saw yesterday’s post about Parkinson’s disease slowing me down but not stopping me and very kindly sent me a copy of the PDQ manual, along with copies of the PDQ-39 and the shorter form PDQ-8 (it has 8 questions, compared to 39 for it’s brother).  I pieced together what I wrote yesterday from stuff I acquired on the Web.  Now, I have it straight from the horse’s mouth, so to speak.

Health Outcomes has licensed their product to over 50 different organizations including well-known PD charities, research groups, Universities and of course Big Pharma and all those interested in assessing the efficacy of various PD therapies. They’re widely recognized as the condition-specific patient reported outcome measure for PD used in regulatory approvals e.g FDA – approvals to market for drugs. Translated into some 80 languages, Isis owns the copyright and commercializes on behalf of University of Oxford, the fees from which are returned to the University to help with ongoing research, including research into PD.

BTW:  If you would like a license to use either of the PDQ’s, feel free to contact them at http://www.isis-innovation.com/licensing/healthoutcomes/health_outcome_request.html

The thing to keep in mind is that both of these PDQ’s are self assessments.  You check the proper box that most closely matches your symptoms over the past month.

I mentioned in yesterday’s post that my PDQ-39 boiled down to a PDSI (Parkinson’s Disease Summary Index) of 48.72.  That puts me right over the line between Hoehn & Yahr class III and IV.  The PDQ-8, which by its nature isn’t as thorough in its questioning as the PDQ-39, gives me a PDSI of  46.875, which is on the OTHER side of that line between Hoehn & Yahr III and IV.  (The dividing line for the PDQ-8 is 47.86.)  But both measures seem quite accurate, placing me on the borderline between III and IV, which is where I feel I am 10 years past diagnosis.

I find this kind of stuff fascinating.  And if you have PD (or love someone who does), I think it’s a good idea to keep a more-or-less regular self-assessment record of how you’re doing.

Thanks again to Dr. Churchman and the good folks at Health Outcomes for helping make this possible!

NOW TAKE MY POLL!

Do You Support Embryonic Stem Cell Research to Cure Parkinson's and Other Diseases?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
More
Last Updated on Monday, 22 February 2010 03:04

After watching the video I just posted, Gail and I both noted how ticked-off I look.  But nothing could be further from the truth.  I’m in a GREAT mood.  (I’m eating CASSEROLE fer chrissakes!)

This is about as good an example of Parkinson’s disease facies (or “facial masking”) as I have ever produced.

A description from my Parky Pal and fellow PD Community “Top Blogger” on Wellsphere, Mary K. (aka “Bibmomma”)…

My face represents my personal identity. It is my way of communicating and expressing emotions. People have said that I look sad or angry when I feel quite the opposite.

A recent Tufts University study found that individuals whose emotions were masked by PD were perceived as less intelligent, socially savvy and trustworthy than other patients.

My face has aged with Parkinson’s Disease (PD). Sometimes when I see my reflection in the mirror, I can’t recognize the person staring back at me. I have that blank PD facial mask that doesn’t truly convey my thoughts and feelings. My outside often doesn’t match my inside.

You’re not alone, Kate…  Here’s a pic of me from when I was 18.

I had quite the lovely smile.  (And hair.)  Here’s another from when I was 33 (and in a Milwaukee production of the musical “Sugar Babies.”

QUITE the expressive face.  But when you look at the screen cap photo from the video I shot earlier today… that’s me, “emoting” for the camera.  And I look angry.

I’m not an angry guy.  Never have been.  In fact, even with PD, I tend to see the humor in things and not let myself get particularly upset about the degradation of my condition or the speed at which it’s happening.

Still, as Kate says, it’s shocking to look in the mirror and see this old person looking back at you… not just old, but either expressionless, sad or angry.

I always thought fat people were supposed to be jolly!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
More
Last Updated on Tuesday, 2 March 2010 10:39

Some items of note that seem appropriate for my 10-year anniversary as a person with Parkinson’s disease.

1.  Ten years after diagnosis, those with PD are 20 times more likely to experience a hip fracture compared to age- and sex-matched control groups.

2.  Regarding Parkinson’s disease dementia:  The dementia usually begins about ten years after diagnosis.”

3.  Regarding balance issues:  ”Hoehn and Yahr were careful to point out that the stages were a general guide and that there will always be exceptions. They identified the impairment of the righting reflex (Stage III) as the point at which the disease became disabling. They found that, after five years, 25% of the people they studied had balance difficulties, had progressed further still or had died. From five to ten years, the proportion increased to around 63% and by 10 to 14 years that percentage became 80%.

4.  MORE cheery news!  “About one-third of Parkinson’s disease sufferers eventually show signs of dementia. The disease lasts an average ten years and ultimately results in death usually by an infection or aspiration pneumonia.”

5.  And MORE!  “One percent of persons over age 50 have Parkinson’s disease, and two-thirds become severely disabled within the first ten years of the illness. ”

6.  “According to the University of Maryland Medical Center, in the early years symptoms can be barely noticeable. Even if they are, medication can be very effective at keeping them under control and preventing them from interfering with a person’s day to day activities. Unfortunately, the effects will worsen each year, and in five to ten years they usually get to a point where daily life is disrupted — even with medication.”

7.  “Thus, while these treatments generally provide excellent results for 2-5 years, quality of life for Parkinson’s disease patients becomes increasingly poor 5-10 years after diagnosis. Symptoms that become increasingly problematic with disease progression include inconsistencies in motor control (response fluctuations), gait and balance abnormalities, cognitive loss, hypophonia and dysphagia.”

I guess that’s why I’m in such a cheerful mood today.

At least there’s CAKE!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

More
Last Updated on Wednesday, 10 February 2010 07:40

Found a bunch of self-assessment tests for PD today.  Here’s how I did…

WEBSTER SCALE

This scale was developed as a simple rating scale that can be used to evaluate the degree of total parkinsonian disabilities. It applies a gross clinical rating to each of the 10 listed items, assigning value rating of 0–3 for each item, where 0 = no involvement and 1, 2, and 3 are equated to early, moderate, and severe disease, respectively. Scores range from 0 to 30, and decline represents decrease in severity of PD signs. Values of 1 to 10 indicate early illness; 11 to 20, moderate disability; and 21 to 30, severe or advanced disease.

Bradykinesia of Hands – Including Handwriting
0 = No involvement.
1 = Detectable slowing of the supination-pronation rate, evidenced by beginning difficulty in handling tools, buttoning clothes, and with handwriting.
2 = Moderate slowing of supination-pronation rate, one or both sides, evidenced by moderate impairment of hand function. Handwriting is greatly impaired, micrographia present.
3 = Severe slowing of supination-pronation rate. Unable to write or button clothes. Marked difficulty in handling utensils.

Rigidity
0 = Non-detectable.
1 = Detectable rigidity in neck and shoulders. Activation phenomenon is present. One or both arms show mild, negative, resting rigidity.
2 = Moderate rigidity in neck and shoulders. Resting rigidity is positive when patient not on medication.
3 = Severe rigidity in neck and shoulders. Resting rigidity cannot be reversed by medication.

Posture
0 = Normal posture. Head flexed forward less than 4 inches.
1 = Beginning poker spine. Head flexed forward up to 5 inches.
2 = Beginning arm flexion. Head flexed forward up to 6 inches. One or both arms raised but still below waist.
3 = Onset of simian posture. Head flexed forward more than 6 inches. One or both hands elevated above the waist. Sharp flexion of hand, beginning interphalangeal extension. Beginning flexion of knees.

Upper Extremity Swing
0 = Swings both arms well.
1 = One arm definitely decreased in amount of swing.
2 = One arm fails to swing.
3 = Both arms fail to swing.

Gait
0 = Steps out well with 18–30 inch stride. Turns about effortlessly.
1 = Gait shortened to 12–18 inch stride. Beginning to strike one heel. Turn around time slowing. Requires several steps.
2 = Stride moderately shortened – now 6–12 inches. Both heels beginning to strike floor.
3 = Onset of shuffling gait, steps less than 3 inches. Occasional stuttering-type or blocking gait. Walks on toes-turns around very slowly.

Tremor
0 = No detectable tremor found.
1 = Less than one inch of peak-to-peak tremor movement observed in limbs or head at rest or in either hand while walking or during finger to nose testing.
2 = Maximum tremor envelope fails to exceed 4 inches. Tremor is severe but not constant and patient retains some control of hands.
3 = Tremor envelope exceeds 4 inches. Tremor is constant and severe. Patient cannot get free of tremor while awake unless it is a pure cerebellar type. Writing and feeding himself is impossible.

Facies
0 = Normal. Full animation. No stare
1 = Detectable immobility. Mouth remains closed. Beginning features of anxiety or depression.
2 = Moderate immobility. Emotion breaks through at markedly increased threshold. Lips parted some of the time. Moderate appearance of anxiety or depression. Drooling may be present.
3 = Frozen facies. Mouth open ¼ inches or more. Drooling may be severe.

Seborrhea
0 = None.
1 = Increased perspiration, secretion remaining thin.
2 = Obvious oiliness present. Secretion much thicker.
3 = Marked seborrhea, entire face and head covered by thick secretion.

Speech
0 = Clear, loud, resonant, easily understood.
1 = Beginning of hoarseness with loss of inflection and resonance. Good volume and still easily understood.
2 = Moderate hoarseness and weakness. Constant monotone, unvaried pitch. Beginning of dysarthria, hesitancy, stuttering, difficult to understand.
3 = Marked harshness and weakness. Very difficult to hear and to understand.

Self-Care
0 = No impairment.
1 = Still provides full self-care but rate of dressing definitely impeded. Able to live alone and often still employable.
2 = Requires help in certain critical areas, such as turning in bed, rising from chairs, etc. Very slow in performing most activities but manages by taking much time.
3 = Continuously disabled. Unable to dress, feed himself, or walk alone.

My total Webster Scale Score — 18

According to the AHRQ: scores of 1 to 10 indicate early illness; 11 to 20,  moderate disability; and 21 to 30, severe or advanced disease.

I also took something called the Parkinson’s Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire.  You can score from 37, which is “no symptoms” to 185, which is “totally disabled.”  I got a 108.  This gets broken down in to sub components.

Parkinsonian Symptoms (score can range from 13 to 65) — 35

Systematic Symptoms (7-35) 16

Social Functioning (7-35) 24

Emotional Functioning (9-45) 34

So, according to the PDQL, I’d be at the upper edge of “moderate disease”.

I also took the PDQ-39 test, so named because it’s a Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire with 39 question.  There’s a complicated method of scoring and I’ll spare you the explanation.  It is broken into the following areas and scores, which range from 0 to 100  (lower is better):

Mobility — 77.5

Activities of Daily Living — 20.83

Emotional Functioning — 37.5

Stigma of PD — 12.5

Support from Spouse/Others — 0 (perfect score!)

Cognition — 50

Communication Ability — 33.3

Discomfort — 91.67

My overall PDQ Single Index?  40.4125 — which would place me at the upper end of Phase III in the Hoehn & Yahr Scale.

So, by all accounts (and keep in mind, it’s a self assessment), nearly 10 years into this thing I’m at the border of moderate/advanced Parkinson’s disease.  I’m still doing comparatively well in the areas of “activities of daily living” and such… but the progression….

Progresses.

More
Last Updated on Tuesday, 2 March 2010 10:41